Jump to content

Talk:George O'Malley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGeorge O'Malley has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Sex with Callie

[edit]

'he has a ton of sex with callie' Doesn't sound right for a encyclopedia -mickiscoole Talk 09:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be longer?

[edit]

Shouldn't this page be longer? Every time I come to this page I feel like a lot of information is missing. It doesn't even have information from the last two episodes. It's the shortest out of all the character pages from Grey's Anatomy. Even Callie's page is longer and we have less information about her from the show. We know tons about George but a lot of that information isn't on the page. All the other character pages have a background, overview, and history section. George's just has a character overview. I would add more to the page, but I suck at grammar. Could someone else please update this page to look more similar to the other Grey's Anatomy characters? Rainbow 22:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the layout to look more like the other character pages, but I don't have time to write out a detailed character bio like I did for Meredith Grey or Derek Shepherd. Someone else, please feel free to come behind me and flesh out the content for George. Also, to the above editor, even if you feel like you're not great at grammar, you can still contribute! There are many editors who tend to just come behind and clean up little typos and things, but if you've the content, by all means add it! DarkandTwisty29 15:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George

[edit]

Nobody likes George because i don't know just people don't like him. I saw in the history in this page and i saw that before this page has Overview and Storylines and History. Why somebody deleted that thing. Could someone explain me? I am user from other Wikipedia!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.29.71.198 (talk) 19:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I know. But if you are so frustrated than why don't you fixed you're self, or better join the project. ---Max(talk) 08:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

US Army Trauma Surgeon

[edit]

I don't believe this should be in the character's occupation because the character never actually became a US Army Trauma Surgeon given the events on the show's fifth season finale.

Now in civilian medicine, to be a trauma surgeon, one has to have five years of general surgery training and then take a two-year fellowship in trauma surgery and/or surgical critical care. George is barely a second-year resident in general surgery; how can the additional of 3 years of general surgery and 2 years of trauma surgery/surgical critical care training be circumvented by simply signing up with the US Army Medical Corp?

Despite being under the auspicies of the military command, army physicians and surgeons still practice civilian medicine; so how can O'Malley be a trauma surgeon with only two years training of general surgery? - Ace 11:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:George O'Malley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 02:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. TBrandley 02:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tate. No rush, but if you could try to do this one by Monday; I'd like to recognize C97 in the newsletter. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 03:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, will do tomorrow. Cheers, TBrandley 05:22, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on the article. I made a few minor edits. On hold for now. TBrandley 17:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All done or replied to. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 17:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
More replies above. TBrandley 17:37, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now. Pass. TBrandley 17:43, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on George O'Malley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on George O'Malley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George O'Malley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]